Nash-Williams theorem

From HandWiki
Short description: Theorem in graph theory describing number of edge-disjoint spanning trees a graph can have

In graph theory, the Nash-Williams theorem is a tree-packing theorem that describes how many edge-disjoint spanning trees (and more generally forests) a graph can have:

A graph G has t edge-disjoint spanning trees iff for every partition

V1,,VkV(G)

where

Vi

there are at least t(k − 1) crossing edges.

The theorem was proved independently by Tutte[1] and Nash-Williams,[2] both in 1961. In 2012, Kaiser[3] gave a short elementary proof.

For this article, we say that such a graph has arboricity t or is t-arboric. (The actual definition of arboricity is slightly different and applies to forests rather than trees.)

A k-arboric graph is necessarily k-edge connected. The converse is not true.

As a corollary of the Nash-Williams theorem, every 2k-edge connected graph is k-arboric.

Both Nash-Williams' theorem and Menger's theorem characterize when a graph has k edge-disjoint paths between two vertices.

Nash-Williams theorem for forests

In 1964, Nash-Williams[4] generalized the above result to forests:

A graph

G

can be partitioned into

t

edge-disjoint forests iff for every

UV(G)

, the induced subgraph

G[U]

has at most

t(|U|1)

edges.

Other proofs are given here.[5][6]

This is how people usually define what it means for a graph to be t-arboric.

In other words, for every subgraph

S=G[U]

, we have

tE(S)/(V(S)1)

. It is tight in that there is a subgraph

S

that saturates the inequality (or else we can choose a smaller

t

). This leads to the following formula

t=maxSGE(S)V(S)1

,

also referred to as the Nash-Williams formula.

The general problem is to ask when a graph can be covered by edge-disjoint subgraphs.

See also

References

  1. Tutte, W. T. (1961). "On the problem of decomposing a graph into n connected factors". Journal of the London Mathematical Society 36 (1): 221-230. doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-36.1.221. 
  2. Nash-Williams, Crispin St. John Alvah (1961). "Edge-Disjoint Spanning Trees of Finite Graphs". Journal of the London Mathematical Society 36 (1): 445–450. doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-36.1.445. 
  3. Kaiser, Tomáš (2012). "A short proof of the tree-packing theorem". Discrete Mathematics 312 (10): 1689-1691. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2012.01.020. 
  4. Nash-Williams, Crispin St. John Alvah (1964). "Decomposition of Finite Graphs Into Forests". Journal of the London Mathematical Society 39 (1): 12. doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-39.1.12. 
  5. Chen, Boliong; Matsumoto, Makoto; Wang, Jianfang; Zhang, Zhongfu; Zhang, Jianxun (1994-03-01). "A short proof of Nash-Williams' theorem for the arboricity of a graph" (in en). Graphs and Combinatorics 10 (1): 27–28. doi:10.1007/BF01202467. ISSN 1435-5914. 
  6. Diestel, Reinhard (2017-06-30). Graph theory. ISBN 9783662536216. OCLC 1048203362.